From an article[1] I’m currently reading:
If you’re a dedicated multitasker, you’re certainly not alone. A 2005 Kaiser Family Foundation report found that 62 percent of respondents said they did any combination of the following most of the time or some of the time while they did their homework: “talk on the phone, instant message, watch TV, listen to music, or surf the web for fun.”
Multitasking? Bollocks. Any reasonable definition of multitasking precludes, to my mind, any combination of things that are not inherently in conflict. As anyone who has been alive since the invention of the radio receiver can tell you, at least if sie’s being honest, “listening to music” and “doing homework” are non-overlapping; to do both at the same time is not to multitask, it’s simply, y’know, doing stuff.
Ditto, frankly, “watching TV”. I mean, soaking up some television is typically described as a passive activity, isn’t it? “Talking on the phone” just might possibly qualify, depending on the level of involvement required by the homework involved, but probably wouldn’t conflict with typical busywork tasks.
“[Surfing] the web for fun”? Here’s where I call bullshit. If the doing of the homework requires neither hands nor eyes, both of which are required for surfing, then it’s not really much of a task at all. If the student is switching between surfing and doing homework, sie’s not multitasking but instead taking little breaks, yeah?
So what is multitasking, under my stricter-than-typical definition? I honestly have no idea, so I suspect it may be a mostly meaningless term. I guess if one were, say, writing at least moderately complex code while conducting a teleconference with hir stock broker, that would count. If all activities being performed do not require a significant amount of mindfulness at all times by the performer, though, the performer is not what I would call multitasking.
[1] Zimmerman, Devin. “Metatasking vs. Multitasking.” Library Journal 132.7 (Apr 15, 2007): 60.