26 October, 2008

Awesome things

Filed under: — Matt P @ 9:16 am
  1. Burma-Shave signs

    I’ve never seen one in real life, but this in no way mitigates their awesomeness.

  2. Barn-roof signs

    I have seen plenty of these in real life, and even the sucky ones rock. The main road in the town I grew up in ran past a See Rock City barn, and passing it was always a thrill.

  3. Towers. All towers.

    Radio towers, electric towers, even cell towers. Skeletons of metal tubing stretching toward the sky really turn me on.

  4. Laundromat dryer exhaust vents

    Stand outside a laundromat, let the warm air that smells of clean! blow over you. Mmmm.

  5. Fallout Shelter signs

    They pop up in the most unexpected places, rusted and warped metal plaques attached to the corner of a courthouse or university building. Heralds of an apocalypse that never was, they persist and age and wither away.

    Had I a trust fund, I would spend a year traveling the country and photographing the signs and the municipal shelters they represent. I would love to document the current state of the shelters, and the uses they’re being put to.

So what gets you going?

24 October, 2008

A technical question

Filed under: — Matt P @ 9:28 pm

Is it possible to run a web server and yet not be able to find out how many times a given file has been requested? I’d assumed that this was something that was tracked by default, but I could very well be mistaken.

Who the fuck says “eff ay queue”?

Filed under: — Matt P @ 2:46 pm

All librarians in Missouri, apparently. Drives me crazy. It’s “fack”, dammit. Hell, you don’t even have to capitalize it any more.

They don’t say “enn ay ess ay” for NASA, so why the trouble with faq?

It’s crazy-making.

23 October, 2008

They think we’re idiots. They really do.

Filed under: — Matt P @ 6:58 am

I don’t know if Patricia Cohen is a Republican shill or if she’s decided to push the “woe us poor conservatives” meme for kicks, but there’s no excuse for writing something like this:

Following Goldwater’s rout in 1964, American conservatives struggled for 16 years before Ronald Reagan finally was elected president.

Um.

Goldwater loses in 1964. Reagan wins in 1980. In the intervening 16 years under consideration, there were three other presidential elections. Three elections during which, according to Ms. Cohen, Republicans “struggled”.

Hmm. What happened during these three elections, this dark time for American conservatives?

1968: Nixon wins.
1972: Nixon wins.
1976: Carter, the most horrible monster known to history, wins.

Republicans take the day in two out of three races. During their period of “struggle”, they are victorious 2/3 of the time. Clearly they were hurting.

Hmph.

22 October, 2008

Another getting-old moment

Filed under: — Matt P @ 6:00 am

The other day I walked into a discussion between a coworker and a student worker, this one involving the pronunciation of the surname “Koch”. They weren’t positive, and I’d read an article a while back, so I chimed in.

“I’ve heard that most people pronounce it ‘coke’, Mayor ‘kotch’ being something of an anomaly.”

No biggie, right? I dropped a factoid and walked on.

But it just now occurred to me that the student worker, being somewhere around 20 years old, almost certainly had no idea who Mayor Koch was. If they’re aware of any former mayors of NYC at all, it would be Giuliani and only Giuliani.

Sigh.

19 October, 2008

Does this suggest systemic incoherence to anyone else?

Filed under: — Matt P @ 7:28 pm

Looking at the discussions about academe among academics, it looks like two of the most widely-embraced priorities for America’s universities are:

  • Increasing the affordability of a college education
  • Increasing participation in studying-abroad programs

So boo expensive textbooks, yay intercontinental airfare?

(The bang-per-buck of studying abroad may be incomparably greater than that of buying a textbook, but the problem isn’t the size of the bangs but the number of bucks, no?)

My first spontaneous fanwank

Filed under: — Matt P @ 5:25 pm

I just read the kerjillionth complaint about how the game of Quidditch from Harry Potter makes no sense, what with the game ending as the golden snitch worth BIGNUM points makes the points scored during the game proper more or less meaningless.

Kerjillion must be the magic number, because reading the familiar criticism this time made me realize that the game can be seen as perfectly sensible if we make some parallels with real-world sports.

It’s well known that the way real-world games are played changes over time. I don’t mean that the rules change–although they often do–but rather that the performance of the players change because of advance outside the game itself. Training methods improve, the professionalization of the game allows for players who’ve spent their entire lives pursuing excellence in the game, and most relevantly there are improvements in equipment. Bats are precision-engineered, as are golf clubs and swimsuits.

In Rowling’s books, we have textual evidence that there are regular and significant increases in broomstick performance, and that these improved ’sticks are available in your everyday broomshops. It’s likely that such improvements follow an exponential curve, but even if the curve is linear we know that there’ve been a couple of centuries’ worth of Quidditch play during which time broomstick engineering has been constantly advancing. We also have textual evidence that, in the past, Quidditch matches could be grueling multi-day events.

The snitch itself, meanwhile, is not just a gamepiece but is also a symbol central to a sport that itself is central to wizards’ self-identity. Knowing how wizards, per the text, tend to be traditionalists, I think it’s safe to assume that both the snitch’s design and the rules of Quidditch itself have been changed very little, if at all, over the years.

So here’s the crux of the fanwank biscuit: In the early days of Quidditch, contemporary broomstick performance was poorly matched to the performance of the snitch. The elusive gamepiece was crafty enough and speedy enough to elude even the best fliers for hours, even days, on end. With the game proper taking place in the foreground as the seekers sought the snitch, play continued long enough for teams in a typical match to score HUGENUM points while waiting for the game-ending snitch capture, which would provide a nice BIGNUM bonus that still fell well short of the total HUGENUM points scored during regular gameplay. As broomstick technology advanced, though, the snitch’s performance advantage was met and, for the purposes of a balanced game, surpassed by the performance that could be expected of a capable fliler. The rules of Quidditch are not inherently unbalanced, then, but were thrown out of whack by an outside-the-game element.

17 October, 2008

Still an entire winter to go.

Filed under: — Matt P @ 3:53 pm

I’m having Lost withdrawals. This season of Heroes just isn’t doing it for me, the new Dexter has yet to grab me, and Doctor Who is equally on hiatus. I really need some good, twisty Lost action right about now.

(Why oh why did they think BrundleMohinder would be a good idea? Can anybody even guess what they might’ve been thinking? And enough with the freakin’ “Days of Future Past” homages, ‘k?)

10 October, 2008

Lesson learned

Filed under: — Matt P @ 9:29 pm

Never eat gyro meat before an assignation, as it has amazing anti-aphrodisiac properties. I don’t know if this is universal or just me; I suspect the former, citing the continued production of Mediterranean children as evidence.

I suspect the same goes for Indian food in general, and with the caveat multiplied eleventyfold.

Here’s a puzzler.

Filed under: — Matt P @ 2:22 pm

Let’s say you were modeling a global zombie outbreak. We’re mostly interested in the maths, but we do require a minimalist visual display. The obvious approach is to represent humanoids as little squares–uninfected humans all one color, infected zombies all another.

The color choice for the zombies is obvious: green. What color, then, to make the uninfected humans? Pretty much any obvious color choice carries with it racial connotations, sometimes unpleasant ones. Worrying about this may sound like political correctness gone amuck, but think about it: even if you weren’t sensitive to the unintended racial undercurrents, wouldn’t a model of Africa look wrong if it were inhabited by little white or pink color spots?

The best I can think of is purple. Would a map occupied entirely by green and purple squares look too weird?