June 28, 1969
In St. Louis last year, during my weekend of debauchery, my companion and I visited the hotel bar. A couple of cute young things settled in near us, and my gregarious companion struck up conversation.
I tried to edge my way in, and of course I was mostly unsuccessful. As you can probably guess, I’m not so great in small talk with the kind of people the Subgenii call Pinks[1], and these kids were definitely rosy. These kids were visiting from some northeastern metro area, I forget which one, and talk turned to upcoming Pride celebrations. I saw an opportunity for joining in, started talking about how I stopped by Stonewall once and was surprised by how small it was, how it lacked the aura you’d expect from such a historic place.
The kids, barely old enough to be sipping their frou-frou cocktails, gave me a blank stare. I blanked and blinked back at them, started throwing out prompts that might dislodge something in their heads–”Cops raiding a bar while people were mourning Judy Garland’s passing? Rioting drag queens?”–and got nothing.
Seeing recent, vital history die right in front of you can be a real buzzkill.
[1] It is widely assumed that anyone who legitimately identifies with a subculture outside the mainstream cannot be Pink. I dispute this. It seems to me that a gayboy who worships Britney Spears[1a] and Paris Hilton, a geek who thinks spouting rote Monty Python bits and “42!” are the height of humor, and a straightlaced suburbanite whose aesthetic needs are fulfilled by Tommy Hilfiger[1b] and Thomas Kinkade are all equally Pink. Resisting the Pink isn’t merely a matter of being other-than-whitebread, it requires subversion of all the narratives that can provide an easy self-definition.
[1a] I gather that Britney Spears isn’t Britney Spears any more, but I don’t know who has replaced her as this year’s Britney Spears.
[1b] See [1a], mutatis mutandis.