Probably not, but I’ll ask anyway.
Let’s say that on one sunny day you’re strolling through a park’s secluded meadow with two standard-featured cell phones and a portable time twiddler. You’re bored and lazily digesting lunch, so of course you decide to perform a little temporal sociological experiment.
You adjust your holo-garbs to period-appropriate attire and twiddle time such that a typical middle-class urban male strolls seamlessly from the same park in 1909. You doff your hats at one another, the 1909-er not realizing he has been caught in a time bubble.
You walk up to the gentleman and show him your phones, explaining what they are. You hand him one, ask him to cross to the other side of the meadow, and then you ring him up. You then meet up again face-to-face and record his reaction. You retrieve the phone, bid the fellow good day, and twiddle him back to 1909.
You then perform the same experiment, only this time the subject is from 1859.
The guy from 1909 will have had some familiarity and experience with telephony, but he will only know it in its early, hardwired form. The 1859 guy will have no prior notions about transmission of sound at all, but he will also have no preconceptions about how such a thing might work.
Which of the two men would be more baffled, astounded, and amazed by cell phones?